American Academy of Pediatric DentistryAmerican Academy of Pediatric Dentistry

SITE SEARCH
Advanced Search

 
Find a Pediatric DentistGo HomeContact UsSite MapCopyright and Disclaimers
 
Members OnlyLog In

  Home

  About AAPD

  Join AAPD

  Policies and Guidelines

  AAPD Journals and
  Publications


  Press Kit

  Continuing Education
  Meetings


  Annual Session

  Healthy Smiles,
  Healthy Children


  Ways to Give

  Dental Health Resources

  Residency Programs

  New Pediatric Dentists

  Parent Resource Center

  Head Start Dental Home
  Initiative


  Online Store

  American Board of
  Pediatric Dentistry


  College of Diplomates



Home >> AAPD Journal >> Current Issue >> Article Abstract



AAPD Journal
Article Abstract

Author:Ângela Cristina Cilense Zuanon, Lourdes Santos-Pinto, Elcilaine Rizzato Azevedo, Luciana Monti Lima
Title:Primary Tooth Enamel Loss After Manual and Mechanical Microabrasion
Abstract:  

Purpose: This study’s purpose was to assess the amount of dental enamel loss on primary incisors after manual or mechanical microabrasion with a phosphoric acid/pumice paste. Methods: Ten exfoliated primary maxillary incisors were bisected faciolingually and the resulting 20 halves were randomly assigned to 2 groups: group 1 (N=10)—manual technique (plastic spatula); and group 2 (N=10)—mechanical technique (rubber cup attached to a low-speed handpiece). Microabrasion was performed on the buccal surface using an abrasive paste prepared with 37% phosphoric acid and pumice. Ten 20-second applications alternated with 20-second risings were performed in each group. Enamel thickness measurements made under

stereomi-croscopy before and after microabrasion were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and pairwise t test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (P=.003) between the manual and mechanical techniques. The mechanical technique produced a mean enamel loss of 274.16 ėm (66% of total enamel thickness), while the mean enamel loss with the manual technique was 152.59 ėm (39% of total enamel thickness). Conclusion: Manual microabrasion using a plastic spatula removed less enamel, but was sufficient to eliminate most superficial stains and defects, and may be a viable option for the microabrasive technique on primary teeth.

(Pediatr. Dent. 2008;30:420-3)

 


About the Journal  |  Journal Archives (pre-2009)  |  Journal Archives (Current)
Search Articles (pre-2009)  |   Instructions to Contributors  |  Submit a Manuscript
Subscription Information  |  Agency Subscriptions  |  Advertising


Copyright © 2002-2010 American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. All Rights Reserved.
Website Designed by AmericanEagle.com, Inc.